Someone above said it isn't what the founding fathers had in mind. I agree, but mainly because most of them didn't think about the areas outside of the East at all.
You are an ignorant fuck who talks a lot of nonsense.
The Constitution specifically is against Federal power. The founding fathers were well aware what happens otherwise.
Damn, you are right! I was just researching the founding documents and John Henry clearly stated that his vision for Nevada is that the Federal Govt buys it then gives the mineral rights to the Koch brothers while the surface rights are owned by some unnamed Chinese who leases it to Bundy fundies and hires Blackwater mercenaries from South Africa to patrol their holdings.
You continue to put forth strawman arguments to support your Communist philosophy.
Ask the Japanese how buying up Hawaii and Rockefeller Center in the 1980s worked out for them. Japan is now bankrupt from that debt-based shopping spree. And they have or will soon have to sell all.
(Again you prove
my point that your political philosophy is rooted in subconscious jealousy, combine with a low enough IQ to support your delusional strawman illogic)
If you knew even diddly squat about business and economics, then you would know that the only sustainable owner of the
arid West are the ranchers (and in patches the miners).
How can I reason with a Communist moron?
This is a political ploy. The residents can gather at a county council meeting and take a vote and see if there is really discord. I doubt it.
If the militia are doing this, it is because of the aggressive war declared on Bundy by the BLM and
those liberal activists who want to go squat on the ranches to make some reenactment of Woodstock concerts to try to prove a point that Bundy is a squatter. But the difference is the ranchers are those work the land and make it sustainably productive since the 1870s.