Gambling an activity for fun also has the chance to turn someone's fortune. Calculated risk when taken in gambling can be the way to big wins from gambling. Who do you think should take more risk in gambling? The rich gambler or the gambler who is not yet rich. If a rich gambler takes risks in gambling, they are risking losing money and becoming poor from gambling, or getting richer, when a gambler who is not yet rich gambles, they can also get poorer or richer, so the gambler who should take the risk should be the gambler who can handle the dangers of the risk like losing too. When a rich gambler loses from taking a risk, there is a better chance of them being in a position to manage with the losses, than someone struggling financially who a big loss will really affect. So, I am confused after asking myself this question and answering it, does this mean a poor gambler should continue to play it safe in gambling? With no risk, how can a poor gambler change their fortune in gambling?
It is not about the Rich or the poor gambler here the important thing is how they can afford to loose what will not impact to lead them a happy and healthy life that amount of gamblers should take risk I will say we should make the categorize by the rich and the poor gambler it should be those who can afford fund to play gambling. After all gambling for only entertainment not a investment thing.
Here I want to say by example like you have 300$ to go on a tour and on the other hand your neighbor have 3k$ for tour here definitely the tour place will can't be same like that neghibor. I want to say gambling is same as like this be on your limit take that risk for the entertainment not as purpose of money making.