We never once said those words to you. You are mixing up your disputes. Normally we don't give lessons in cheating, but you need to step up your game if you are you are going to be a good cheat. You also accidentally sent us emails for 2 separate accounts from the same email address. Get your act together or find a real job.
Firstly, what I want to express is abusive betting—perhaps I used the wrong term. Based on your previous response, I genuinely feel that you are unprofessional and extremely disgusting. A casino mocking its players? It’s as if I’ve won a lot of money at your casino, but I haven’t withdrawn a single penny. How can you still justify saying such things? Did I send emails to you using two different email addresses? Who’s writing this script? I registered on your platform using only one QQ email address, so why are you claiming that I sent you emails from two different addresses? It’s utterly revolting, and your behavior has already gone beyond what most people can tolerate. I truly can’t imagine how many players have been unable to reach you and whether they can find you on this forum. I believe there must be a significant number of victims. You’re accusing me of creating multiple accounts—how can you even say that? What kind of small-time casino can’t even pay out a few thousand dollars, yet you think people would create multiple accounts for you? Even $10 is considered a lot at your tiny casino. This is beyond disgusting. I can’t believe you’re still mocking players. This is the first time I’ve encountered such a situation—zero professionalism.
[...]
OP, I believe you used the wrong term,
again when you mentioned "small-time" casino, and meant to say "big-time", otherwise the sentence doesn't make any coherence, being small casino and won't mind to pay a few thousand dollars.
Anyway, this "small-time" casino is one of the few with 100% resolution rate on this forum, one hundred percent, 11 in 11 cases, for the past one and a half year [and maybe more, my list just didn't extend that long]. Not one, not even one, that ended with inactivity due to their unresponsiveness. They've dilligently giving updates and all. I personally think that shows professionalism and trustworthiness.
In avoidance of any doubt and/or you using a wrong term again, and to understand a better narrative of the story, can you perhaps show us some evidences that I've been keep asking and you're yet to provide? It might help.