He was indeed late in his dues it can’t be denied but he always cleared it when he saw fit but I don’t think he has intention of scamming people. I don’t think a flag or negative trust is necessary in this case but if you think otherwise then nothing is stopping you from painting him red.
I've already done that a long time ago as I described in a previous post. Being late isn't a great defense for someone who's got an obligation to pay a lot of people (and I'm talking about his prior campaign(s) where he certainly didn't seem to have any respect for people's time or need for money). Can you imagine if you had a real-life employer who just paid you whenever they felt like it, and you never knew what to expect? That shit wouldn't fly.
Well it’s reasonable.. Then what about these cases.
I can't say I'm surprised that this has not been resolved given that "Edward Miroslav" has been found guilty of several immoral practices (account buying, trust buying) etc.
This wasn't a targeted mute, I'll unmute your account shortly, thousands of accounts are muted a day to prevent faucet abuse automatically and this just seems to be a false positive. Unfortunately we don't have an option to disable faucet on a per-account basis other than using mute, we'll be fixing that as well.
What does surprise me is that Stunna, even though he/she unmuted you, never fully tried to resolve this case. Why is that?
Another example of review farming:
https://forum.primedice.com/topic/29824-earn-a-quick-50k-satoshis/.
According to Op support of this Dice website Primedice asked them to deposit and lose the amount before getting unbanned is this behaviour acceptable this is worst than someone flatout ignoring the withdrawal of a player.
- Trust buying on their forum from this website (Is this acceptable?)
Then here’s this case of duelbits denying a player withdrawal of 1million usd by calling them out for cheating.
https://casino.guru/duelbits-casino-player-s-account-has-been-closedAnd they still operate freely.
People in their campaign will defend the brand they are promoting as long as they are getting paid by it.
There are many other cases that i can look into. I would like to know your thoughts on these.