Re: Are sports betting winnings more like active or passive income, and why?
When we research online, we often find that gambling winnings are considered passive income because they rely on luck and don’t require continuous effort. However, I don’t consider gambling, especially sports betting, to be passive income. You know, professional gamblers put in significant work to analyze matches—they read news, collect data, create strategies, engage in discussions, and some even use AI to compare results...Well it's a whole process 
While luck is a factor (of course), the substantial effort and skill involved make sports betting distinct from typical passive income. Therefore, I believe that sports betting winnings should be classified as active income, similar to trading or commerce, which involve both risks and the potential for profit or loss, like in any business.
This is only my point of you... what do you think
Considering sport betting as a complete game of luck is totally out of it, and that can only be done by those who don't know what it takes to analyse and predict a game that might not even still play as predicted and you will still have to predict again. Sport betting's chances of winning in most cases are based on 60–70% of the person's prediction skill, and the rest is based on how lucky the gambler will be that very day. If we are to talk about games in which winning is based on luck, it should be for slot games.While luck is a factor (of course), the substantial effort and skill involved make sports betting distinct from typical passive income. Therefore, I believe that sports betting winnings should be classified as active income, similar to trading or commerce, which involve both risks and the potential for profit or loss, like in any business.
This is only my point of you... what do you think