Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Time to rethink these feedback? Lightlord at it again for the umpteenth time.
by
The Sceptical Chymist
on 30/08/2024, 07:44:30 UTC
You said “Renting out signature space but not endorsing it” Now people who wore 1xBit and YoBit’s sigs were just renting their space not endorsing it and they got negged for renting their space. Now Primedice, Stake owner(s) Buying trust, Accounts from this forum, Asking a player to lose funds to get unbanned (Then the owner unbanning and calling it a false positive), Leaving cases on hold abandoning the forum and still running their campaigns without any problem in open (That’s another thing they’re hiring incompetent manager and a few spammers on the forum that post max quota and spam the shit out of gambling section to keep their thread at top) and Scam hunters don’t care/give a shit about it? Or they’re flat out ignoring it because they will not be able to deal with the hate of majority of campaigners that lost their job. You are contradicting what you said.

I'm not contradicting anything I said--when I wrote about not personally promoting or endorsing what's rented out in a signature space, I was stating my own opinion of how campaigns should be viewed (and how I view them), and that was in response to one of the statements you made about some folks standing up for whoever's hiring them.  Obviously not everyone shares my viewpoint.

As to the rest of that stuff, I once again plead ignorance because I haven't looked into the gambling shenanigans (which I stated) and would defer that to other DT members who are familiar with 1) the shenanigans and 2) gambling in general (which I also stated).  There may well be some double standards going on; I've seen that in the past, and it's happened with lightlord's case.  I'm just not going to Leeeroy Jenkins myself into a tangled mess and start negging people without researching the problem.

And once again, I'm leaving that to other DT members.