What you stated is highly debatable and cannot be taken as a matter of fact even though claim it but for a moment even if were to believe Trump was the best bet for the future of Bitcoin in the U.S. going forward, would it be appropriate for voters to cast their vote based on one aspect alone? For example, whether Trump or Harris in future made pro-crypto noises, does it matter if they are removing funding from a sector most people care about including low earners and those that need free medical or social care? Or of they are overspending on sectors they care little for?

Crypto will survive long after Trump and Harris are replaced by others.