I am not in favor of mixers, predicted their demise here, and laughed at the clowns who were defending them for a paycheck. That being said, mixers can’t be replaced with non-KYC exchanges. The thing about non-KYC exchanges is that when they get enough user funds, they turn into KYC exchanges and then steal everyone’s money. If this hasn’t happened to you yet, it will if you keep using them.
Well, then what solution can be devised to satisfy the privacy rights of bitcoin users? Mixers were a "
good" tool.
Forum users always "
defend" various service providers with paycheck, be it mixers or casinos, but one can't but agree that mixers are necessary for the
BTC-community. You know, I would not refuse a function offering a choice of "
public transactions" and "
private transactions" in the
BTC-network, so that everyone could choose which to use, although I realize that a publicly accessible blockchain is a "
feature" of bitcoin.
There is nothing to discuss about exchanges with KYCs. Nothing can be more harmful for the
BTC-community, but these exchanges have already
won.