So, remember people. Wasabi is completely trustless software, as long as you already have private coins, trust another person to join your coinjoin, and deliberately blacklist yourself on every coordinator you connect. Trustlessness on steroids.
OK, if the Wasabi coordinators have those "weaknesses" in their system, what can the developers do to address them?
How does it sound to start being honest with your people? It's OK to admit that it is not completely trustless, people will get it. Neither Samourai, nor Joinmarket were completely trustless. There's always a small risk of getting Sybil attacked; it's just the way coinjoins are constructed. But, no, we have Mr. Absolute Truth here harassing anyone who dares to claim that Wasabi might not cure cancer.
I'm neutral, but I agree. There's always a non-zero chance that any software, network, system can and will be exploited.
Stop that.
Why shouldn't people who want to know about privacy learn that BlackHatCoiner and o_e_l_e_o were hired by a custodial blockchain analysis company? This warning can't be repeated enough after the years they spent camping this topic in order to scam newbie Bitcointalk users out of their coins and data.
OK, if the Wasabi coordinators have those "weaknesses" in their system, what can the developers do to address them?
What "weaknesses" are you talking about?
It may not be proven in practice because there's probably not enough incentives for hackers to attack and exploit those coordinators. But on paper? You can't say that the system is "perfectly/100% not exploitable". That would be dishonest.