Perhaps the problem is not that the Manchester United coach was too bad, but that the Liverpool coach was better in the current match? But undoubtedly, the score of 0 - 3 is a serious indicator of some problems at Manchester United. It should be taken into account that football is a game of "struggle" strategies, when victory depends on the ability to predict the tactics of the opposing team and be able to form a counter-tactics. There is a certain element of gamble in this, when you do not know what the opponent will choose and you try to counter it with your option. And one more thing. The outcome of the event is influenced not only by the coach, but also the team, the physical and mental health of the team members, motivation, and what can I say, even the stadium where the team plays. That is, I want to say that "victory" is formed from many factors, in which there are many unknown variables, although the coach plays one of the key roles. Let's hope that Ten Hag will stay in his role and will be able to prove that he is not so bad.
That is the most accurate indicator because in fact it is because the Liverpool coach is more astute at seeing opportunities and he managed to make it difficult for Manchester United's front line to create opportunities. The strategy of dampening Manchester United's attacks was successfully implemented by Arnold Slot and made them beat Manchester United at Old Trafford. There are many variables in a winning strategy in a team and it is influenced by many things so that there is some debate about who is stronger. Manchester United have experienced two defeats so far and maybe Ten Hak is not in a comfortable condition in the coaching chair because he has got everything he wants, even for the new players he wants have also been fulfilled by management and the results have not improved as desired.