If Manchester play with full effort and good performance then they will deserve full point otherwise the opposition team is there. And it will be good for Manchester to win the match because they are a strong and well-performing team. Therefore, they have to win this match at a loss. This is not good for them as Manchester looked in a very good position in the earlier matches and now they are ruining their position. They should play hard and fast in the next matches, then they will definitely win. What is the fault of TEN HAIG in this, yes they win or they lose then there is no right to talk against Ten Haig because they are playing for their performance and win.
Manchester United have the squad to defeat Southampton in their next match, the only problem is inconsistency. Ten Hag is the problem of the team couple with some players like Rashford and other players, because the new signings Manchester United made this season should be enough to help the team in terms of performance.
Manchester United will be playing against Crystal Palace and Tottenham, if they were able to win Southampton, the others will be difficult for them because the remaining teams are also in need of the three points; therefore, Ten Hag needs to be sacked if there is not proper amendment in the squad if he really wants to make the seasons.
Am still finding it difficult to see the squad you are referring to. Is it the weak defense and midfielders you are talking about? Manchester United will score on that day and Southampton would score as well but i cant agree that Manchester United is going to win the game. Perhaps it will either end up to be a draw game or luckily Manchester United to win the game. The only reason i cant completely trust Manchester United is that i do not know the exact strategy Erik Ten Hag might adapt that day. Lol the dude is unpredictable and none of those strategies works out fine for him.
Man City have truly struck a diamond, and it wasn't in vain that they had to spend 150 million Euros to sign Haaland because it paid off handsomely. So it stands to reason if Man City offer Haaland a new contract (with the change in the release clause option) because they don't want to lose their goal machine. He has been the top scorer in two consecutive seasons, and it's likely he'll get it again this season as he's started the season so impressively.
I think you might have missed things up but Halaand was bought by Manchester city from Dortmund for a fee around 50 million euros and I don’t think there was add ons or any clauses that much. So the 150 million euros is fake. The deal is actually a bargain by Manchester city and this new contract is just to increase his release clause or buyout clause more. The 175 million actually looks too small if you ask me considering that clubs could pay ridiculous amount this days. Imagine when PSG paid 220 million euros for Neymar and 180 million for Mbappe, this 175 million euros can be trigger and that’s why you see clubs like Madrid putting a billion euros clause on their star players just to fend up potential suitors.
In as much as this is good for the club it is bad for the player because whenever they want out it becomes hard for them due to their clauses and wages. Halaand new contract could take him level with De Bruyne who is the highest paid player in the premier and if this happens it will be hard for most European clubs to match this offer in the future and he could be tied down to Manchester City for long
Haaland would be willing to play for Manchester City for long. The fact still remains that they are the Champions of England, if they continue with the same performance each season he would be paid equally with De Bryine. And i dont think Haaland is after the money right now because he is still a young palyer, if playing at Manchester City would give him the trophies he is looking for then he wouldstay there and get the fame and glory he wants.