Agreed that there is no evidence, however, the government always wants to inquire very much closely on the people and invade their privacy if they want this.
What are you talking about? How is there no evidence?
They wanted to make wallet providers ask users for KYC so they can assign wallets to IDs! This was a real legislative act they wanted to push through Congress.
How is that not an attempt to deprive people of privacy?
The Democrats see self hosted wallets as aiding tax evaders, money launderers, drug traffickers and other criminals. Republicans believe self custody preserves basic freedoms in a digital world.
Representative Sherman (Democrat) compared self hosted wallets to bearer bonds which were banned in the U.S. in the 1980s.https://www.ledgerinsights.com/self-hosted-wallet-congress-privacy-freedom/This is very much correct, however, what I was telling the mr. democrat legiteum is there is not evidence that the government was hacking directly on the people. However, because of these laws very much similar to what you mentioned and laws like the Patriot Act, the government are giving themselves the right to invade the people's privacy.
I am quite certain Harris cannot mention that she is against CBDC because this would certainly make the rulers from Wall Street and the banking industry very angry heheheh.