2. Maybe it is the case. My point is that I think you got a little drifted away with conspiratorial theories. 
Tho as I mentioned before I agree with you on some points of shady marketing. It's just the general idea of the huge scam from people who created such advanced product is somewhat questionable.
Tho as I mentioned before I agree with you on some points of shady marketing. It's just the general idea of the huge scam from people who created such advanced product is somewhat questionable. Oh, I totally agree with you there. The purpose for creating this technology was not a scam. No question about that. This is a totally different animal from say bitcoin-copy-paste clones.
As I said earlier, my leading theory (though not incredibly high confidence) is that they developed it for more or less the same reasons Satoshi developed bitcoin, but they didn't move quickly to get their coin out and adopted, and they misdesigned it with a very fast reward curve (probably being overly optimistic about how quickly it would be successful). If they had done a few more things right, who knows what could have happened. This could have been Litecoin, or even, possibly, exceeded Bitcoin. But they didn't, and it is what happened later that I take issue with.