Your quote is broken, so i had to fix it.
1. That means you're suggesting people to install library not needed (pqcrypto) to run code you shared.
2. You say "Revealing part of the private key each time can make the system more secure as it limits the exposure of the full key".
3. Since we need to find different library which implement XMSS or implement by yourself, that means code you shared is useless.
4. Can you give us link to the ogs-python library?
5. Based on everything you said, you're not being helpful and could give confusion to beginner. So IMO nobody should make a donation to you.
1. Regarding the pqcrypto library: You’re right. it wasn’t necessary for the code I shared. I included it thinking some might want to explore quantum-safe libraries, but it’s not required to run the script.
2. About revealing parts of the private key: I realize I didn’t explain this well. In XMSS, the key exposure is managed carefully, and it's secure if used correctly. The way it works is different from how we typically think about traditional keys, but it’s safe in this context.
3. On finding an XMSS library: The code was more of an educational example to show how you could build a quantum-resistant-like address, but I understand that it’s not practical without the right library.
4. Link to oqs-python: Sure, You can check out the oqs-python library .
https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/liboqs-python5. Regarding donations: the goal here was more to explore and share what I’ve been learning
1. Now you're just repeating what you've said previously.
2. Did you even notice that i only write incomplete sentence, where i don't really state or ask anything?
3. But previously you claimed "Full Script for Generating a Quantum-Resistant-Like Address".
4. I did some reading about it and found this statement,
Is OQS safe to use?
OQS began as a research project to enable the prototyping and evaluation of quantum-resistant cryptography. As the field of post-quantum cryptography starts to mature with emerging standards, it is our goal to mature our codebase into a production-track version that is suitable for use in production environments, while also maintaining an experimental-track version of the our suite that continues to support research and development in new post-quantum cryptography algorithms.
5. Noted, but some people would question your actual goal.
i am one of those people that did not question his actual goal. i think i can pretty much understand his intention. however, i do question why the hell are you so rude in your replies to him. whats wrong with you? woke up on the wrong side of the bed? sound like an old prick. your status here doesnt mean others have to take your crap yeah.