Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin would have averted this painful loss, shame on fiat
by
Sandra_hakeem
on 16/09/2024, 16:47:18 UTC
Bitcoin is boss, not by mouth only, you see what fiat cost that innocent guy trying to do a legitimate trading business. His money was useless for him by fiat bank arrangement, no one knows where the actual fault came from due to too many parties involvement and the banks will do it authoritatively, they set the price and charges as they like on your own money.
That's a big lie! There's always a middleman in every transaction from the host bank to another bank (if need arises) . In this case, according to the scraps of information about the case, this wasn't a bank to bank transfer so HTF were they not able to trace where the fault was from?

Quote
The bank transfer must have delayed his transaction for at least two days only to realize that almost €100 was charged for transferring €1,000 to the beneficiary account. Fiat is just silly, banks are crook and feeding fat on people's money.
A beneficiary account? This is a different case... I think there's a complication somewhere; €100 can't be surcharged for a transaction of €1000... The fiat system has never operated without compliant.  Sometimes when I decide to fill out the withdrawal slips in the bank, the number of people queuing up, waiting for the customer care rep to attend to their diverse cases is enough to tell anyone the truth