Chelsea have everything but not the defense, that department haven't been brilliant and I think they're the 3rd worse in the EPL this season. Enzo haven't tried to amend that spot to be a little bit strong as the attack, I won't say much about the midfield because they're not consistent, like today you see them doing well and the next they're doing the opposite of what they did in the previous game.
To me I think if Chelsea have the kind of defense Arsenal have they're good to go because the attacking line I just as perfect as any coach would want and adding the Arsenal defense it makes the team to be solid and the midfielders can as well improve and do much better week in week out. I'm just saying but what do we have to say about that? Because if you want to say the clubs that have the best defense in the EPL, in the top 5 Arsenal is either 1st or 2nd, what do you make of that?
Yeah that's a question for us, defense has been a continuing problem for Chelsea even in recent seasons but somehow we don't see any improvement efforts there for example by bringing in great players in the defense line instead they focus more on the midfield and attack lines even though we know all lines are quite important. Indeed, in the last transfer window Chelsea brought in 3 players for the defense line but all of them were young players which means it takes time to get the best defense, maybe they are building for the long term?
For now we can't draw any conclusions because the league has just started but at least we have a comparison with other teams like Brighton and Nottingham who only conceded 2 goals in 4 matches well, with this situation, of course we wonder how Chelsea can compete if their defense is worse than mediocre teams? It is clear that even though Chelsea have great strikers, it doesn't mean anything if their defense is weaker.