Suppose OP agreed that it'll be his last attempt of dispute resolution, how about you reached to the ADR as well, writing that you'll appreciate their help to put an end to this for good, that a player with "OP's email address/AG username here" will write to get a dispute resolved, and you'll appreciate if they can review the evidence you provided with the email.
IMO, that should put a lid to this case for good.
We have no interest in what OP agrees to. He has created approx 50 accounts at Betcoin (played on 4, the rest were created around the same time and lined up for when he snuck these winnings by us). We know that he has been accused of similar elsewhere, and he has essentially admitted this, based on his reference to a “consistent betting pattern” which was never once stated by us.
An accusation on BitcoinTalk is resolved once we agree to binding mediation at an ADR of the player's choice. We don't have to say anything else. He has attempted to seek a resolution at 3 separate mediators (there was 1 contacted prior to this thread being created). If a mediator refuses to take the case, that is not our issue, and is overwhelmingly because the mediator can detect an obvious scam when he sees it. We have lost a total of 0 mediations, and that's because we do not withhold funds unless a player is confirmed to be a malicious, repeat scammer.
Every reply to this thread makes it more likely that it will harm our reputation by coming up higher in a Google search. We are done replying to this thread and we kindly ask you @holydarkness, to do the same. There is no need for back and and forth. If the player cannot find a mediator of his choice to rule in his favor, there is a reason.