I understand that there are no users on the Ethereum blockchain and we are trying to beat the transaction speed such that it will be as fast as opening the app on your smart phone. But I am yet to see a wide application of zero-knowledge proof which, although I have seen in Scroll and some other tokens, especially the latest ones aiming to solve security and speed issues, but how well do you think people will cope with this way of making faster and safer transactions?
You raise a quite an important question in the development of blockchain technology it relates to very crucial speed and user experience on the Ethereum blockchain. And, quite possibly, zero-knowledge proofs can do a lot to solve these problems!.
ZK Proof can make both safety and speed much more efficient by allowing transactions to be studied without exposing any data. Innovations such as Scroll are leading in this. Many factors will, however, determine the adoption. More users should further understand the technology and get confident about using it.
This will be important as well to educate people about how ZK evidence works and why in this regard. Its experience for a user has to be seamless. Either adding ZK evidence complicates the process or viewed as too technical, which may hinder its use.
As these technologies mature, I think we'll see ever more tools that will help smooth out the user experience. On the other hand, it doesn't waste evidence from ZK.