Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Is Telegram The New Haven for Bounty Hunters?
by
markm
on 22/09/2024, 22:40:42 UTC
From what I've seen so far, Telegram is the future of bounty and token hunting. I'm afraid platforms like Bitcointlk have seen their best days. What do you think?
Everything is just time, I believe time will come when we will be able to see some good bounties also. Everything is trend, so I believe it’s just telegram period, and I recommend everyone to utilize it well, time will come when we won’t see any good project on telegram. So don’t think bounties are over on bitcointalk, if you have been on the forum for long time, you will know that there are times when the bounty sections are always drive, but whenever their is a new trend in crypto, attention might be shifted to forum again, so don’t panic.

It seems possible, maybe even likely, that here one might have a better opportunity or setting you get to Know Your Investors and to Know Your Players.

It might benefit Prospective Investors (PIs) to have this venue as an apt place to observe Prospective Players (PPs), particularly if such PIs were able to influence in some manner whether such PPs even get into various "bounties" or "airdrops" or "special opportunities" etc let alone whether they qualified for any "scholarships" or "sponsorships" PIs might have it in mind to (prospectively, ha ha) offer.

It might benefit Prospective Players (PPs) to have this venue as an apt place to observe Prospective Investors (PIs), particularly if such PPs were able to influence the same darn things but with respect to the PIs.

The idea that is coalescing here is that the audience - the readers of any public part of these forums they care to browse, armed with the profile pages of any of this forum's members they care to look into - might in principle be able to reach some - possibly very subjective - ideas as to who are properly to be categorised as PPs and who as PIs, which idea leads on to how might one get PPs and PIs to self-categorise, basically to declare themselves as one or the other, so that one could thence proceed onwards to further ideas like whether PPs would even want PIs to jump in and actually play the game(s), bearing in mind that some players (and for all I know, maybe some prospective investors) might have misgivings related to concepts such as "pay to win"...

Very nebulous thoughts so far but possibly food for furthur thought(s).

-MarkM-