These are interesting times indeed. People are robbed of their crypto with weird weapons, one with a $5 wrench here, another with a Toblerone bar there, and many others with big tits.
But what's apparently more interesting is why the prosecutors who seized 23.5
BTC from a 2020 robbery are allowed to convert them to cash. Those coins are stolen assets; why aren't they returned as they are? If the authorities seize a stolen bike, which specific provision of the law allows them to convert that bike into cash?
I don't trust Cointelegraph with journalistic practice but I wonder when the conversion was made, whether they had the permission of the owner, and why the high court decided to assign value to the asset based on the price during the commission of the crime and not during the conversion of the coins. Or better yet, why not return the entire proceeds of the conversion? Did they retain a good amount for themselves?