I remember CM yahoo once said like "slots in campaign is not a right but a privilege". If you agree on this, then I guess long term holders deserve slots in campaigns.
Honestly, I can't find the correlation you are trying to establish here, the campaign (which is not a right) and HODLing are not the same, or do you think the HODLing will now make it your right? I don't understand.
I agree that people will cheat like a long term holders and manager may find hard time to track these and while accepting new participants, managers can easily check about merit history but confirming about long term holder is not an one minute work. This is the reason, I think about reservations in slots as minimum as 10%.
This is the easiest thing to do, Bitcoin transactions are visible to anybody. The manager will only ask for the HODLing address, and that solves it all. But my plight is that investments should never be forced on anyone for any reason.
This idea help on reducing selling pressure on bitcoin market if weekly payout from campaigns reaches exchanges on regular basis and in significant percentage.
I think I understand where this idea is coming from but it will not work. The money we earn here is too little compared to what Bitcoin needs ($Bs), especially if we commit only 10% to it. It will be almost nothing.
Also, this may help on reducing spam in this forum because people who treat campaigns as income source may move on.
It will not! Your forum activities and your posting creativity and dedication are different from your investment. Anyone may fake it to achieve the same goal.