Why do you think discriminating against SBF doesn't have any basis in justice? What is suspicious about that?
You're not the arbiter of justice. Just because SBF is a criminal doesn't justify people taking the law into their own hands and preemptively discriminating against him. But even if we agree to disagree on moral grounds, it's still suspicious for a pro-Bitcoin service to support censorship, when the core principle of Bitcoin is its permissionless and censorship-resistant nature.I'm not against the idea of Japanese refusing foreigner tourists from shopping in their stores or nightclubs that require strict dress codes. Other are not obligated to interact with you, even if you offer them money, period.
Absolutely, but I never argued otherwise. Merchants should have the right to choose whom they serve, but that doesn't change my view of their actions. Just as they are free to make their choices, I am equally free to express my suspicion of them.No, I don't think it's suspicious that someone would treat criminals differently than innocent people.
So, to sum up. It's not suspicious if someone's definition of "everyone" precludes criminals. Alright, lol. 