Re: Shouldn't there be a forum rule against obvious AI-generated content?
Hey @Alone055 you should go to this thread and post the one I'm referring to you can't find it right now. AI Spam Report Reference Thread The member you refer to here have already discussed those posts on the AI Spam Report Reference Thread. Even that member has been given a neutral tag.
Thank you for this. I looked but couldn't find the thread, I guess I was looking in the wrong section for it. If I had found it earlier, I would have been able to report the guy before LoyceV, I guess.
As others said, plagiarism rule covers this nicely, but unfortunately mods are less leniant to ban people over that type of plagiarism (some would say for any type of plagiarism as well). At least for now.
I agree that people who post AI content should be banned for plagiarism, but i believe mods don't want to start banning people for it because some of the AI detection tools give false positives if you run a post through them.
I'm aware that there are certain tools that give "accurate" results if a post is generated by AI or not, but maybe mods don't want to solely depend on these "external" tools to ban users on the forum, because it will prolly create a lot of drama with users claiming that the tools were wrong about their posts.
I'm aware that there are certain tools that give "accurate" results if a post is generated by AI or not, but maybe mods don't want to solely depend on these "external" tools to ban users on the forum, because it will prolly create a lot of drama with users claiming that the tools were wrong about their posts.
At least users who are posting obvious AI-generated content should get punished for it. Even if they don't want to, mods will have to depend on external tools in this case because that is the only way it can be proved that these plagiarizers are doing the wrong thing.