Re: Shouldn't there be a forum rule against obvious AI-generated content?
Did you know that websites like BPIP, Nintastic, ImgTalk, etc all use plagiarised code? It's legal in the form of "packages", so why shouldn't AI content be legal as well?
The Open Source licenses allow this use, and (usually) allows you to make changes as long as you credit the original writers. By crediting them it's not plagiarism.I don't believe that these websites are plagiarizing anything, even if they don't credit the thousands of authors on each project. They are not changing the code, just using it.
One thing is for sure - the lawyers will make their money on changing terms alone. Next time my word processor suggests "you are" instead of "your", I don't want to have to credit the software, or the people that wrote it.
