I worked on Dogs for less than 2 months and I made $70 and so are many of my friends and I worked on Hamster Kombat for more than two months and I got 350 and the pre market price based on what I saw on some article is $0.1 which will translate to $35.
Do you think its worth the effort? Anyway, its free money I read that they deleted millions of participants from cheating which is why many are complaining.
This picture summarizes my comparison between Dogs and Hamster Kombat, How about you? How do you compare the two.
I got this picture from a post on social media from one disappointed participant.
Both seem to be in the work pipeline for a considerable amount of time. Some of the comparisons you make also open up interesting points regarding your effectiveness in the work. The two months of earning $70 through Dogs while $350 from Hamster Kombat marks a pretty marked difference in such rewards. But the most important thing is the content.
And what with reports of millions of people leaving the market due to fraud came out, especially once the price of Hamster Kombat had dropped and frustrations turned into a critical mass. How long will the project remain viable and fair? - - - even if free money is attractive. But the value of your effort should take the latter factors, such as the stability of the said platform, income that may occur in the future, and sustainability of these projects into consideration.
Furthermore, weigh up effort against performance. Think about how much time you are prepared to devote to one of these projects. Especially so, if there is a question of the number and the loyalty of participants. Your comparison throws into relief the kind of careful attention such activities demand.