Re: Shouldn't there be a forum rule against obvious AI-generated content?

But AI is not plagiarism.

I disagree. Let's look at the definition:

Quote

an act or instance of using or closely imitating the language and thoughts of another author without authorization and the representation of that author's work as one's own, as by not crediting the original author

Oh, the definition card. I trump that with the details card: An AI does not have thoughts. AI is a tool much like Grammarly or a typewriter.

(forgive the sarcasm, you know I love you)

I sometimes use similar tools like grammerly, quilbot (mostly) or a typewriter, when I'm writing a long post. (You know, just to make sure that there are no grammatical or punctual errors. Tongue

). Does that makes my post a plagiarism? Umm, I don't think so. The content was originally mine, I just fixed it.

afaik, if you are not the original author and don't mention the source, it will be plagiarism. AI is basically giving you content that you never wrote, and people are just using it as their own. So it's plagiarism.