I think hamsters have too many participants and a lot of rules to make, but the results are not comparable to all that is seen from a lot of participants, compared inversely to dogs, doing a job that is not too difficult and not too many rules to be done. So a lot of participants just benefit the developer to make a lot of rules and receive rewards from what is specified and not returned to the participants.
If you compare, in my opinion, as a participant too,, you can be sure dogs are still much better than hamsters.
For the level of satisfaction and work results dogs are above hamsters and that's real. But what makes many people disappointed is that their work is paid in stages, not all at once. If it were all at once, I think users would be more or less satisfied with the results of their efforts to help increase the popularity of the coin and become contributors to other income from several task options that must be completed by participants.