When the political party changes, there is a big change in everything. Whatever Kamala Harris or Donald Trump comes to power will change things. Putting crypto currency as a positive and negative for a party will change the political turn and harm crypto. If someone really supports crypto and not just for political reasons then he will be far ahead of others.

Currently Trump's support for Bitcoin is definitely positive towards crypto. If he wins then as a crypto lover I will definitely support Trump. But I am worried about how positive these leaders will really be after coming to the power.
[/quote]
Things aren't that simple. "Supporting cryptocurrencies" doesn't really mean anything. It's like saying someone is supporting gold, that someone is pro-stocks or pro-money. Question is what pro-crypto would even look like and from whose point of view.

Regulations for crypto can be seen as pro-crypto by legitimizing it, however it does mean tougher laws for it. And only recently, with mandatory kycs and proof of money trails people are starting to grasp what that means when crypto goes mainstream. So long this has reminded of early days of internet, being as bad and unorganized as it was. Newcomers don't even realize where we were just under 10 years ago. When first big crypto exchanges after mtgox started exit scamming, no one actually believed that anyone would go to jail for that.

And broad framework for current crypto regulations and aml laws were created during Trump's last presidency, they have just been tested and evolved more since. I can pretty much guarantee that Trump didn't read anything related to it back then, and haven't read since.

Also how can trump be pro-crypto when he obviously haven't got a clue what the whole concept is.