This statistical table is interesting to me. You have to look at where Brighton and Ipswich get all this money from and what they get in return. There is no direct correlation between money spent and success. At least for many teams. The fact is that without spending money you have no chance of winning anything. So spending money is not guaranteed to bring success, but not spending money is guaranteed not to bring success.
Looking at the table, Napoli should be in a much better position in Serie A and Lyon in Ligue 1. We are already used to the Arab clubs spending money, and West Ham and Tottenham seem to be the clubs in the Premier League that spend a lot and don't get what they should.
Maybe it would have made more sense to spend money on the infrastructure to develop young talents instead of paying so much for players.
Nah, there's a big direct correlation between money spent and success.
Brighton, West Ham and Tottenham didn't able to become a champion, but at least they almost have no chance to be relegated.
Napoli and Lyon actually aren't the richest teams in their own domestic league, Lyon was almost relegated, but they spent a lot money during transfer window and they make from 18th position to 6th position.
Ipswich Town is the only team from Championship that isn't in relegation zone.