Since the start of the 2023/24 season, no player have had more goals involvement in the English Premier League than Cole Palmer. The England attacker have two more than Manchester City's Erling Haaland. Considering the fact that Cole Palmer was deemed surplus to requirements at Manchester City which made them allow him join Chelsea last year's summer, do you think Pep Guardiola and the management of Manchester City is now regretting the decision to allow him go or not? Would he have been this prolific if he had remained at Manchester City?
Cole Palmer is able to shine brightly at Chelsea because Chelsea is only full of young players whose quality is not much different from Palmer or slightly below Palmer. But when he was at Man City we knew Cole Palmer had difficulty competing there. Because we know Man City is always full of star players and experienced players. I'm happy that Cole Palmer is coming to Chelsea. Because that way he can show his true potential to everyone. Because if he stays in Man City then I think this player will find it difficult to show his potential. Because he won't have enough playing time to show it. And I don't think Pep Guardiola will regret losing Cole Palmer either. because Man City currently has many good players who can actually be relied on to make Man City continue to dominate the Premier League and even in the UCL. Cole Palmer is still young and he will still get better. So he really should be at Chelsea, which is much more interested in potential young players who will continue to be developed into better players. Meanwhile, in Man City, we always see that the players there have to be ready for much more difficult challenges. So it requires much more mature experience.