Is it the same to use Kangaroo with 4 cores as with 12 cores? No, right? Because it is an algorithm that depends on computing power, which is limited (technology does not advance so quickly and the difficulty of the puzzles grows exponentially). That is, your probability decreases exponentially with time and the difficulty of the puzzle.
.. rest of BS ...
Let's cut straight to the chase: did you break the square root bound of finding a key in an interval? I am talking about the ECDLP problem in an interval.
If you did, congrats, I wait for the paper.
If you didn't (which is most likely) then we are definitely not on the same page, so engaging further in a discussion is useless, just like with COBRAS, since you didn't understand what the issues are. Shrinking some exakeys in a 1 KB file is not relevant to the subject.
I know what I’m doing and I know my approach and my limits. I’m not interested in breaking ECC. I know you are digaran (“your actions and opinions are admirable and those of others are worthless,” that’s your pseudo-scientific motto), but that doesn’t matter to me. We live in a free world, and there are faster methods without revealing. I reserved one since the beginning of the year, as I already mentioned, because I only need a more powerful PC. I didn’t think my life was going to take so many turns, but so it is. Starting over until the day comes, I’m not in a hurry because money is only a necessity. I will only feel the gratitude of victory before revealing it, while I share ideas that in the future I think will be useful. I only answer you to leave you without arguments and run away with some of these nonsense that more than arguments are from immature personalities.
What is your argument in the last message? This is not how you win debates; you only portray yourself.