It's up to signature campaign managers to write terms for their campaigns, and assess post quality before broadcasting payment to signature campaign participants.
If low quality posts are not counted and paid by campaign managers, campaign participants who write these shitposts or low-quality posts will stop and improve their post quality. After some warnings from signature campaign manager, if a campaign participant does not change, he will be eliminated from the campaign.
I agree and disagree.
Whether we like it or not. It is true that Signature Campaigns do some how incentivize Shitposting. Even if the Member makes 20 Posts out of which 4 were completely unnecessary but written strictly for the Post count, that is 20 percent of their Posts being qualified as Shit. And I doubt a Manager would expel the Member because they thought they had a little number of unnecessary Posts, though they could skip them and not count those for the Post count of the said week.
The reality is. If there were no Signature Campaigns, the number of Bitcoin Talk Members would be very little while many others would seek alternatives to earn a buck.
-----
My advice for you @OP and other users, just post what you like and what you want without need to follow other users' advices because this is just a forum, a place to express, not a place to impress.
This is true. Tryhards almost never earn a Merit. You do not rank up by being a tryhard.