In short, you are only hindering research with your supposed theoretical intuitions without real scientific basis in practice. Respect the community. Of your five messages, all contain fallacies that do not represent reality because you speak from misinformation. That’s why you were so disliked when you used the name @digaran. Self-analyze, bro. If you find this topic useless, just ignore it.
OK, I admit it, I am digaran! I only have one problem: I can't prove it.
Fuck all the research papers and all the mathematicians that dedicated their lives to them, and of course, even all the very practical software that proves you're full of non-sense and negate what is in front of your eyes. You live in your own reality, the one that broke the square-root bound (congrats on that) and I'm really impressed about how everyone managed to put in practice your ultra-lightweight DB. Or not, because it can't work the way you think it can, no matter if von Neumann himself rises up from the dead and takes a stab at it, because of the square root bound (5th time I mention it, since you probably didn't even looked it up what it means). You're lost, buddy. Buy a GPU, try out JLP's kangaroo, does it work 50x faster than your CPU, while using less power? If yes, than you have smth to meditate on for a while. Go read the CUDA introduction, look at the nice drawings on the first page, understand what transistors are used for, or the difference between a generic CPU vs dedicated computing units. Only then we can have a serious talk. No amount of storage optimizations will ever decrease the number of actual operations needed to solve a problem. You are looking in the wrong place.