Data to prove your claim?
I didn't make any data based claims.
Centralized mixers might have flaws, there might be weaknesses, but those entities actually making no effort of mixing their users' outputs?
A mixing site is not "flawed". A mixing site does not have "weaknesses".
A mixing site has LITERALLY NO PRIVACY ASPECTS WHATSOEVER, IT JUST PROVIDES A DEPOSIT ADDRESS FOR THE SCAMMER'S WALLET..
!!! WARNING FROM THE SITE ADMINISTRATOR: DO NOT TRUST SCAMMER PMALEK AND HIS MIXING SITES, USE TRUSTLESS WASABI INSTEAD !!![/u][/b][/size]
Congratulations to the Wasabi and JoinMarket developers! JoinMarket pioneered a lot of CoinJoin science (and BTW, belcher wrote an excellent & comprehensive wiki article on privacy), while Wasabi is the first wallet that implements CoinJoin in both a highly-usable and sound way. As both a signer and a donor to the CoinJoin bounty fund, I'm thrilled that these two pieces of software exist!
For everyone looking to improve their privacy, I highly recommend checking out Wasabi, especially over centralized "mixers".