I know shit post are meant to be tracked and fizzled out of this forum and I can't dictate for the moderators and admins, but for improvement sake and a possible prevention of a repeat of such post, isn't it better for administrators to just lock the post for awhile, rather than delete it immediately?
The moderators know what they are doing. Anyone who feels that their posts that were deleted is not supposed to be , should created a to dispute them. And who knows maybe the topic may be allowed to be reposted.
Or isn't it more appropriate for administrators to apply any of the options of which includes to either lock the post for a while and delete later, or arrange similar shit posts into a separate board and delete later, so as it acts as a reminder to others and to the creator of such post on the kind of post not to make and present?
I don't think this is necessary. The moderators are already overwhelmed and doing this is a long process. The reminder is the pain of having your post deleted or locked so that you can review and not do what will make your topics locked or deleted.