Here we go again, buddy please don't get it twisted, you should understand that everything about a man's wealth, savings and asset or (will) should be a personal decision, so dont judge a man that took such decision of not revealing his seed phrase to anyone despite knowing that his health condition has deteriorated and knowing fully well that he wont live to enjoy his Bitcoin holdings as the case may be, I think it wouldn't be nice to question anyones decision without knowing why such person took such decision beside as i have said earlier, it is a personal matter of the holdings owner to do whatever that pleases him irrespective his health condition, he can decide to give it to anybody or even allow it to waste, since no one knows his reason for such decision, I think no one should also question his decision to that effect talk more of judging or tagging him to be a wicked person, I think we should be guided, I wouold have been better for you to maintain where you said he would have let someone know about it than regarding home as a wicked person, if I may ask have you even considered the kind of people he has as relatives and even as that I wont question him because his decisions was final and as such shouldn't be in anyway opposed.
I agree with you, one has personal freedom regarding one's property or stash. He is free and should be given freedom as to where and to whom he spends his wealth. He can make any decision regarding his property at the moment before his death or at the normal moment. No comments should be made knowingly or unknowingly about him. If someone dies leaving his property intestate or loses access due to his physical or mental disability then our comment should be, his property is his liberty, we have no comment. Before facing such a situation, he decides for himself whether to entrust his property to someone else or not.