As I said in my previous post, I don't have to open an office somewhere to operate my business. It's an online business. The licensed casinos write in the TOS that players from certain countries cannot play in those casinos. But if a casino does not have a license, it doesn't have to block anyone. I am curious how they issue an international arrest warrant for tax fraud while the casino owner is anonymous.
Anonymous? Licences in Curaçao are given to anonymous people? A judge sends the request to the Curaçao authorities and that's it
I am giving you an example. Cryptocurrency is banned in Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, and some other countries. But crypto exchanges like Binance, Bybit, Kucoin and all other centralized exchanges are operating their business in those countries. The government cannot do anything against the, except for blocking their domain. Millions of people in this region using Binance.
With this example you make it better for me. They can't do anything against a company that operates illegal services? It's like you're telling me that they can't do anything against a guy who sells child pornography to people in Bangladesh or Nepal because he is anonymous and lives in Curaçao. On top of that, in this case he obviously doesn't have a licence.
Maybe they don't want to or they are turning a blind eye but of course they can act against Binance and the others. Besides, the CEO of Binance is not anonymous.