Yes, I also believe that this statement will be like all the previous statements, they will link and string everything together, and finally they will come up with a statement with 1 name based on their research. But at the end of the day, they will have no concrete or clear evidence to be sure that the person is Satoshi.
They did all these things on purpose, not coincidental. They described their research, spent resources to make a film and it does not make sense if their conclusion is "We don't know who is Satoshi Nakamoto". I hope people can see this point, as a media company HBO must gain something from money they spent for making this documentary film.
It really annoys me that every now and then someone wants to dig up news about him when he has decided to stay silent for over 15 years. After all, even if we do find out Satoshi's true identity, what do we do next? We can do nothing but satisfy our curiosity, which is not beneficial to him or us.
It is freedom of speech. If you want to find who is Satoshi Nakamoto, nobody can prohibit you doing this. It is like you want to find a truth, if you are prohibited to do this, you lose one of basic human rights.
As a senior Bitcoin investor, I don't want identity of Satoshi Nakamoto to be found. Because if he is alive, he will be arrested like people behind mixers. He will be sent to jail, and Bitcoin will get big problem with massive panic sell.