That's your interpretation. Trump said he will deport Haitians, he didn't elaborate if there will be any consideration about asylum, and knowing him it wouldn't make sense to assume he'd be humane about it.

To put it another way, if Trump says (completely hypothetically) that he would jail journalists or let police do whatever they want, would you still be sanewashing it as if that could never happen, even given the near-absolute immunity granted by the Supreme Court?

Not to mention just the basic fitness for office implications. How much can someone talk nonsense, including unlawful and unconstitutional nonsense, before we should say that no fucking way this person is fit to be president. Rhetorical question of course. There is longer any guardrails on at least one side of the political spectrum.