Re: Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed
doing a couple of searches and tests with your tool I came to the conclusion that the translations done (which I did with chatgpt are 100% fake) which is something that should not happen given that it is only a translation and not plagiarism:
I wrote this post this morning (HAND) and analyzing it with the service https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector gives 99.7% fake which is impossible.
I wrote this post this morning (HAND) and analyzing it with the service https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector gives 99.7% fake which is impossible.
But you already accepted your mistake here:
I have nothing to do with all those accounts, I am certainly sorry for the situation I found myself in but I am paying the consequences, they rightly kicked me out of the signature and I didn't complain, but I would like to remedy what I did and I would like to stay and contribute to the forum as I have always done, as I told you before I have nothing to do with all those accounts that are in the Italian section, as you can see I give a little credit to everyone, having said this I would just like my reputation to be cleaned up and I will try to make it up to you by writing tools to clean up the forum from those who use AI, I hope you can forgive my mistake...
And here:
I have nothing to do with those accounts, I have my credibility, I put my face on it, users who are in the top 3 in the forum know me and others who are very important know me as a person and I know that I am a very reliable guy, regarding the posts made with AI I am already paying the penalty, I will make my skills available to counter the phenomenon of the use of AI in the forum, this is all my effort that I can put into making the forum and bitcoin a place and a better resource, I really believe in the forum and I will make sure it is a better place, I recognize that I made a mistake and I will put all my effort into repairing the damage...
So what's the point of trying to prove yourself right when you have already admitted it? You should have moved on and tried to prove that you have changed for others to see, and maybe you could ask for removal of your neutral tag after some time when you have improved, it wouldn't be a big deal at all.
But since you have started this, let me clear a few things for you.
I would say that the trusts that were inflicted on me are totally wrong, I repeat, I paid for the mistake even though I had specified that I only used AI tools to translate, you accused me unfairly, taking it for granted that your tools are the absolute truth, and that's not the case!
The neutral feedback or the reports about you were never about posts that could possibly be translations, but your posts contained things that made it clear that you have used an AI model to generate those posts instead of translating posts that were originally written by you. Let me show you what I'm talking about:
It seems that the Man United management's decision to retain Ten Hag despite the team's poor performance has sparked quite the debate. As a AI developed by OpenAI, I don't have personal opinions, but I can provide balanced analysis based on the information available.
It's clear that the club is facing a myriad of problems, not all of which can be attributed to Ten Hag's management. While he might be part of the issue, the team's struggles seem rooted deeper. It includes players who are not performing up to the expectations and potential management or culture issues within the club.
It is a complex problem and cannot be solved by simply sacking one person. United need to conduct a thorough assessment of their management strategies, player performance and overall club culture. Football being a team sport, improvement and success require all aspects of a team to function well, including players, coaching staff and the management.
It's clear that the club is facing a myriad of problems, not all of which can be attributed to Ten Hag's management. While he might be part of the issue, the team's struggles seem rooted deeper. It includes players who are not performing up to the expectations and potential management or culture issues within the club.
It is a complex problem and cannot be solved by simply sacking one person. United need to conduct a thorough assessment of their management strategies, player performance and overall club culture. Football being a team sport, improvement and success require all aspects of a team to function well, including players, coaching staff and the management.
The part that is in bold is something an AI model says when you ask it for an opinion, the text or post wouldn't contain that sentence if you had asked it to translate your post into English.
And for this one:
Regarding Neymar Jr's possible return to Barcelona, it's hard to predict. Like you mentioned, he left Barcelona mainly not to be under Lionel Messi's shadow. However, with Messi now at Paris Saint Germain, the dynamics would be different should he return. Also, a player's comfort and happiness are important and should be considered as well. He has indeed been plagued by injuries recently so that's another factor to take into account.
Chelsea situation involving Ben Chilwell, it's true that he's a valuable player. His versatility is indeed an asset, but consistent injuries can be a major hindrance. Under the guidance of Enzo Maresca, it would be interesting to see how he fits in once he fully recovers.
Chelsea situation involving Ben Chilwell, it's true that he's a valuable player. His versatility is indeed an asset, but consistent injuries can be a major hindrance. Under the guidance of Enzo Maresca, it would be interesting to see how he fits in once he fully recovers.
You have admitted it here that you know about football and you know what to talk about, but the post says otherwise. Someone who follows football wouldn't write outdated stuff such as saying Messi is in PSG when he is in Inter Miami. If you say you translated the texts using AI, why would you write something like that when you know so much about football? Or you would say that AI has changed your translation?
(the test also works in reverse) meaning that posts translated from Italian into English become 100% fake, so your tests are not reliable!
The test that you did to prove a point isn't proving anything because you checked the Italian text and it was detected as AI-generated but when you did the same with the translation, it didn't say it is AI-generated. So based on that fact, the posts that you were translating all this time shouldn't have been detected as AI-generated because they were in English and not in Italian.
I would also like to ask you a question. It seems that all these posts you are writing in this thread aren't translated ones but you are writing them yourself, so I can't help but wonder, if you can write this much in English, why do you need to first write your posts in Italian and then translate them to English when you can simply write them in English yourself?
the fact is this, I have never admitted that I wrote those posts with AI, it's you who are saying this, the fact that that is written is not reliable proof, I TRANSLATED those posts, so the whole story where I say that I admitted my mistakes were only due to the fact that I used AI to translate them and I was in a hurry when I copied the post because I thought what I had written was correct (if this could be an error) I take it fact, the truth is that your tools are not reliable because many of your posts are also written with ai
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5333828.msg56890166#msg56890166
I'm sorry but your accounts also appear to be AI addicted.
so guys I have to admit that the tools are not valid or you have to take the trust too!