I guess there is nothing to think about since the accused (if it's a right word), has already come out to deny the rumor that was made claiming that he was Satoshi. Though, whosoever made this conclusion from those few post, actually made the claim based on what looks very much like an evidence to him, but if we all look at it from different point of view, we might slightly disagree.

Now, let's take the first image above for example. I believe majority of us on this forum starts our conversation with "of course" especially when we agree to someone's statement, so I don't really know why HBO would come up with a conclusion that someone actually created a thread, and later on accidentally login into another account to agree with that same thread that was created. The whole story doesn't add up.

And as for the second image, I can't really understand what the entire discussion was all about, but he never used the word "I", but he used the word "we". So he wasn't just the only one that figured out whatever they where interested in finding.

The bottom line is, the accused has come out to deny the claim, so we all should probably move on with our lives and wait for who is next to accuse of being Satoshi. It might even be you @OP.