I believe this is not the first time,on several occasions lot of persons have been accused of being Satoshi.Fews weeks back,I was watching videos on YouTube and I came across a video where a man denies he's Bitcoin founder.The whole shit about the real Satoshi is just tiring and not really necessary.
I see no reason why the world is so curious to discover the real Satoshi,an inventor chose to be pseudonymous, should that be a stress to others? Satoshi Nakomoto will be recorded on history as one of the greatest inventor because of his unique identity.Its actually a wise decision Satoshi has taken never to reveal himself to the world,let's just take a good look at this,the governments are against Bitcoin and if they are against Bitcoin how much more would they treat the inventor of what they are against,it's clear that he won't be treated fairly so he knew it before time.
Currently,HBO has come up new documentary and allegations that Peter Todd is Satoshi.Peter Todd being a cryptographer and an early Bitcoin developer doesn't mean his Satoshi I totally disagree with their opinion.HBO documentary film are looking for massive subscribers so they taught of coming up with an idea the world have long been waiting which will definitely yield more views and subscribe.Peter Todd denies being Satoshi Nakomoto on X

Source