But, either way you go, you need to plan ahead and think about items such as:
cracking program to use
server
client
how you will load the client and cracking program on all of those machines and hit "start"; will you have access to be able to SSH into each machine?
ttdpool and ttdclient already have this. Fastest client, secure server and startup scripts.
You have lost your mind coming on this forum and spreading lies lol. Just stop.
Yeah, TTD is the fastest in skipping keys, generating wrong private keys, and losing your money. Yes, I agree, it is the fastest in those things. So please don't come on here trying to advertise for them and spread half truths.
I know, the owner does not take testing seriously at all, I've got receipts, so don't come at me with some BS.
To whom it may be interested in testing the following, don't believe me, just do it yourself.
try the modified kangaroo in a bit that takes you 2 hour to decipher.
then replicate it with the original kangaroo (slower) and you'll see that it solves it in less time.
This actually makes no sense. The modified kangaroo programs out there that increased the search range to 254/256 bits, did not do anything to increase speed / efficiency. Unless you have ran both and extracted the data in the workfiles, do not comment on it and spread false info.
I have not seen one modified JLP program, for increased bit range search size, that had speed increases. All they did was make the workfiles, double the size. Instead of only increasing the distance entries, they increased the points and distance entries; so now the workfiles are double the size.
You can run all of your tests you want to, but math is math, it doesn't lie. If I have a kangaroo program that is 3 times faster than yours, I will find the number of average DPs needed to solve, 3 times faster than yours. Efficiency does not equate to being able to search higher bit ranges, you dig?