Is it even necessary to know who he is? , I do think Satoshi is the most humble man on earth to have hid his identity. Satoshi has done his part and has decided to make himself unknown so I do not think there is any need digging deep. The question is that , if Satoshi is known would it make any difference, will it not be exposing him to government attack and will it not lead to the end of bitcoins if pressured by the government?.
I think the bitcoin community should forget about the whole thing and focus on making the technology much more better .
Even if what they said seems right , then it will he true that he did not build it single handedly.
The Govemment are the ones making research trying to uncover the identity of the creator cause that's their only chance of controlling Bitcoin, just the way they're regulating Ethereum and other Centralized coins today. The Bitcoin community has nothing to do with it.
However, I was able to do my own personal research about Peter Todd's 5 Bitcoin wallets he has used on to forum to see if I could find any with a huge sum of Bitcoin (i.e from 1000 to 50,000 BTC) but I couldnt find any, but only one of his wallet where he was seen to own just only 638 BTC worth $39million dollars with today's current price.
So I doubt Peter Todd been the real Satoshi
If you think that proves anything then you're mistaken, I'm not saying the report is true but your defence is weak. Do you really think Todd is going to put up all his assets online? Man has a lot of stack somewhere, he's an early bitcoiner, he understands what privacy. The address you found could be one of his inactive wallets.