While secondly, I think I have an important question to ask
If truly Peter Todd was Satoshi Nakamoto just as the HBO Documentary claims, why would he have created two bitcointalk account back then, that is, "Satoshi" which was created on November 19th 2009 and "Peter Todd" which was created on December 7th 2010? Or was it because he wanted to earn double through signature campaign? Because I'm sure there wasn't any signature campaign back then.
I laughed when I read this, I considered your statement to be sarcasm because why will signature be the first thing to come to your mind abi you think say Satoshi broke to they run signatures assuming it was available then? What should come to your mind for someone as influencer and respectful as Satoshi to create a second account, should be to hide his identity (stay more anonymous).
Peter Todd denies it, he wrote " I'm not Satoshi" on his X account.
What do you guys think???
Obviously he isn't, I think theymos is lol. Infact we're all Satoshi. Anyone contributing to the growth/adoption of Bitcoin is Satoshi in my books. Bitcoin isn't a one man project as they're trying to make it one. We're all involved in Bitcoin growth so we're all Satoshi.
God, looking at some names on that thread and how long they have been into Bitcoin, I can only imagine how wealthy they should be if they bought then and held up to this day. We might be saying the same thing in the future so guys don't forget to buy and hodl and forget about who's or isn't Satoshi.