...
Since the Dem Deep State already has control of Amazon and Google, why would they want to seize them? You can see the control in the lack of media freedom they operate, both in the air waves, and in the books that are being suppressed.
Since the Dem Deep State already has control of Amazon and Google, why would they want to seize them? You can see the control in the lack of media freedom they operate, both in the air waves, and in the books that are being suppressed.
So, what is Trump supposed to do which he could not do when he was president to attack the so called Dem deep state which alledgedly has control over companies which are publicly traded, like Amazon and Google? He cannot seize them because that is communism and communism is bad and according to you the government of the United State does not have the power to get private property from people.
In reality, if Trump get re-elected he won't do anything meaningful or positive besides some tax cuts for the rich and perhaps negotiating with Putin on how much of Ukraine he is going to keep for himself and that's it.
By the way, you would consider the USA has literally violated the rights of their own citizens in the past for the sake of programs like MkUltra. Of the government is willing to kidnap people to test drugs on them then I am sure they won't have much of a problem stealing private property and getting away with it.
You generally can't do things that you don't know about. But now that Trump knows about the censoring that the Deep State is doing, he can combat it.
The control that the Deep State has is the voluntary operation of the companies that the Deep State has control over. In other words, company leaders are part of the Deep State.
If seizing companies is the only way that you can think of that Trump could take control, there might not be any way to explain things to you without writing a book.
The meaningful things that Trump might do when elected, is to prosecute Deep State people for the illegal things that they do.
Yes, the US has violated the rights of their citizens and people. Or is it the United States at all? There is law that says that if a government person acts illegally, he is not acting with government authority, but personally. It is partially the peoples' fault for not learning about how the common law works. If they knew, there would be very little adjudication against them, even if they were guilty.
If people knew just a little law, long ago, the IRS tax and drivers licenses would have become non-existent.
