Regarding the argument that better players will win, yes, you are right, but that does not mean that we should facilitate abusers/cheaters with 5-6 times the starting stack. It will be very, very difficult to play against an infinite stack (who has no pressure). I mean, how many all-ins are you going to win?
I urge you to reconsider your decision as nothing good will come out of it.
Regarding all in and things, I think only in the last event I lost my mind and was out very early but if you saw me in the rest of the tourneys then I think everyone will agree that I did not do bad. In these type of no buy tournaments, you need to be patience and give time to mature the game. Abusers will try to suck your chips but you don't give them the chance. Again not a prefect solution but at least this worked for me. We will improve as we go, please have patience.
Sorry if I sound annoying (I do not have a choice here). It has nothing to do with your or my performance in the tournament, I mean who cares? If you think you are representing some sort of argument with your performance, you are not.
Though I am more than happy to take a lesson from you about 'how to play against abusers/colluders/cheaters,' I do not think this is the right time. This time you are responsible for creating a fair tournament, and I gave you a suggestion in that capacity (you can teach me poker some other time

). For me, fair play is essential and fundamental compared to any marketing gimmicks. I understand you cannot stop cheaters absolutely, but you are opening an easy way to do that (which can be closed right now).