But there's still a good thing with decisions they do since somehow they can force those casinos to comply with regulations they set. Also by this it can lessen the possible scams and we have certain indicator that a casino is good platform especially if they are compliance to the law. But we can't deny that there's still a problem with implementation of the law and if they could just strengthen up their presence maybe there would be more better result especially for chasing online criminals who do serious crimes.
I think I have to agree with you on this too because of the recent incident that a member on this forum talked about. It was about a kidnapper that abducted some and ask for ransom which was demanded to be paid into his gambling account and because he had actually done KYC on the casino, he information was exposed. Such is a good thing that the casino helped out because they complied with government policy.
The kidnappers was a dumb guy and he thinks by using a casino he can afford to hide from arrest or identity exposure, that is insane and could only happen when you already as guilty as hell and about to get caught for the crime, if not he should have thought that the casino will always provides his full name when deposits are about to be made into that casinos bet account, and from that point, the sender can have access to his full name and further investigation could lead to his arrest.
It likely that the casino was not even involved in his exposed tricks, since with just the payment tag from the casino police can carry out investigation from there and leading to his exposure.
I think the guy lost his mind that he couldn't just figure out that a direct transaction into his casino account could lead to getting his details because he did KYC on that casino. There's a parable in my culture that says, "who the gods wants to kill, they first make him mad. " That's was the case of the guy.