But the burden of proof on what? That my opinion is that there are centralized mixers that accept the trade-offs of being centralized/be a trusted-third-party to do what their service is supposed to do?
Yes, you've had a week to justify
your opinion with a single shred of proof that supports it:
BUT like you posted in your post before, you have no data to the claim that any/all centralized mixers are mere wallets that do not mix their users' outputs. No data = no proof = ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The burden of proof is on you, not me.
You accuse ALL of them of being scams? OK, then please provide the data/proof of your claims.
The burden of proof is on you, not me.
And after a week you failed to find
any proof whatsoever of a "mixing site" actually performing a privacy operation on the deposits of their users in the process of stealing them. Since you clearly know that "mixing sites" are scams, why do you continue to pretend there is a chance they are providing a service?
I wasn't accusing any specific centralized mixer of not doing their job, it was you, and you're asking me for proof?
I'm not even accusing you of being wrong. I was simply asking for practical/readable and verifiable data for fairness sake, and for the sake of the topic. Because if no one could provide the data, then the claims will always be open to debate.