I read that "
Ripple Labs Founder Donates Another $10 Million in XRP to Support Kamala Harris," and we all know Ripple still has that ongoing SEC case. By principle, politicians shouldn't take gifts that could mess with their decision-making. So, what if Kamala becomes president? Ripple will definitely expect something back for their support.
And what if politicians take donations in altcoins, like how Trump also received some? Does that mean their decisions on regulations could end up favoring altcoins over Bitcoin?
Without Bitcoin, I doubt if altcoins will remain stronger in the crypto market, because we all know that Bitcoin is a major cryptocurrency pair on all major exchanges, of which if it is affected, every other coins stands to be indirectly affected too. Hence, Bitcoin will always remain stronger weather it's been used as s medium to support the forthcoming US presidential election or not. However, judging from the central message of the thread it says
"Ripple Labs Founder Donates Another $10 Million in XRP to Support Kamala Harris",, it didn't say the founder of Bitcoin, of which you literally wouldn't have expected a founder of XRP to use Bitcoin to support Kamala Harris.